philosophy.lander.edu        

Introduction Homepage > Syllabus > Position Paper       

Your position paper can be a reasoned defense or a critique of a philosophical thesis. It should not be done as a research paper or a collection and arrangement of diverse sources. Instead, your paper should exhibit two central characteristics:

· an intensive analysis of a philosophical thesis, and

· your criticism of the thesis and your supporting arguments.

[1] An Introduction where you state the purpose of the paper and what you intend to show. This might include summarizing the main parts of your paper

[2] An Explication where you explain the basis for the philosophical view you are examining. Be sure to present this argument or thesis as persuasively as possible.

[3] The Counter argument where you present objections to the thesis and give your supporting reasons for those objections.

[4] The Resolution of the problem where you either support the original view by overcoming the counter arguments or you reject the original view by showing the objections constitute unanswerable difficulties. (If you cannot take either of these two positions, then explain carefully why the problem cannot be solved in its present form. On many philosophical issues this is the best course to take. In such a case, try to suggest what further work needs to be done.)

[5] A Conclusion where you restate the purpose of the paper and summarize the main parts. Finally, restate your position.

· an abstract consisting of a summary of the essential features of your paper

· word-processed or typed, double-spaced, and proofread, 4-7 pages

· a minimum of three sources: one primary, two secondary

· footnotes and bibliography in proper form; all ideas and exact quotations properly documented

· your reasoning and thought explicitly stated

p Step 1: Reading. Preview several philosophy papers in the text and note the important topics. Next, ask yourself what you already know about the subject. Finally, read the papers with your own ideas in mind. Question what you are reading, and mark passages which are either unclear or important. In this manner, your reading is active: your ideas will either be supported or opposed by the writers of the papers. Consequently, issues will suggest themselves to you.

p Step 2: Finding Topics. Look for the following situations which arise from your reading:

p Step 3: Selecting a Topic. Once you have a list of possible topics, evaluate each topic according to several conditions:

· Do I have the background and skills necessary to do this topic?

· Do I have enough time to do the topic justice?

· Is the topic clear in my own mind?

· Is material readily available for researching the topic?

· What skills?

· What type of information?

· Is this the best topic to do from the point of view of my educational needs?

· Does the instructor have a bias or preference that would best be avoided? Is the topic in the instructor’s field of expertise?

· Is the topic one where the instructor can be of help to me?

· Is the topic one which will be most likely to produce the best grade or the best education for me?

p Step 4: First Ideas. Construct on separate pages short notes in answer to the following questions. Your paper will not include all of the notes formed from this outline. As you answer these questions, write as if you are writing a letter to a friend. Suspend your critical faculties.

· What makes the problem important?

· What is the history of the problem in terms of how it has been formulated?

· What is the history of the problem in terms of the kinds of persons who have been interested in it?

· What are the various proposals?

· What argument(s) bring a particular solution?

· For each conclusion, what facts or assumptions are involved in the premisses?

· What solution is presently considered the most authoritative?

· If a solution has been disregarded, why has it been disregarded?

· When an author has provided a solution, does she argue against some other point of view?

· If she does, what are the objections? Does she consider objections to her own proposals?

· What are the advantages and disadvantages to the proposed solutions? Are some proposals not really solutions? Why not?

· What is the value of a solution in advancing your own knowledge? Does the solution suggest a change of perspective? Does it suggest a way of solving other problems?

· Are there various formulations of the same solution? If so, is one formulation superior to the rest? Why?

· Is the solution developed in a logical and sound manner? Is it coherent? Are the facts true? Are the assumptions acceptable? Are the objections answerable?

p Step 5: Working Plan. On the basis of your first ideas, compose a general outline which gives:

· The central problem of your paper.

· The point of view from which the topic is developed.

· How the paper proceeds: its division into subtopics and an orderly development.

· The Conclusions reached in your paper.

p Step 6: Rough Draft. Taking the topics in your outline and the list of first ideas, write the whole paper without searching for the exact words or phrases. Your goal is to finish-no matter how bad (or good) you think the paper is up to this point.

p Step 7: Writing. Taking one topic of your paper at a time, focus your whole attention and effort on one or two specific ideas. Write out the ideas, then rewrite. When you find that your rewriting is no better than the original expression, then you are ready to move to a new topic. When this stage of the paper is completed, wait at least a day before you go back to read critically what you have written.

p Step 8: Outside Comments. Get at least one friend to read your paper and point out ideas or arguments which are unclear. If a point is unclear to a friend, it could be unclear to your instructor. Clarify any of those points in your paper. If your friend understands what you have written but disagrees with cogent reasons, you may want to include more in your paper.

p Step 9. Proofreading. Proofread your paper word-by-word and sentence-by-sentence. Some people find it helpful to proofread a paper backwards, sentence by sentence. All grammar, punctuation, and spelling of which you are not absolutely certain should be verified. Although this work is painstaking, it pays dividends. Often the omission of this step makes the difference between an A and a B. (Make a list of errors you habitually make and keep the list in you dictionary for handy reference, thus saving time in proofreading for future papers.)

p Step 10: Completion. Type or word-process your paper. Again proofread carefully and correct any typing errors.