# Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic Quiz: Successive Immediate Inferences

Directions: Given the truth of "All splitscreens are practicums" what can be validly inferred about the truth or falsity of "Some practicums are non-splitscreens"? (Cite the proper logical relation and appropriate truth value for each successive inference. You may abbreviate by using "S" and "P" for "splitscreens" and "practicums.")

 Statement or Proposition Logical Relation Truth Value 1. All splitscreens are practicums given true

NAME ____________________________________________________

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic
Quiz: Successive Immediate Inferences

This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2K.1beta (1.48)

Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, Nikos Drakos, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, Ross Moore, Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.

The command line arguments were:
latex2html successivef02q.tex -split 0

The translation was initiated by Lee Archie on 2002-11-17

Lee Archie 2002-11-17