Next: Summary of Informal Fallacies
Up: COURSE SYLLABUS Philosophy 103:
Previous: Course Requirements
Contents
Index
Subsections
- Argument:
- any group of propositions of which one is claimed to follow logically from the others.
- Inference:
- the reasoning process by which a logical relation such as entailment is perceived.
- Entailment:
- a relation between or among propositions such that the truth of one proposition is determined by the truth of another proposition or propositions and such that this determination is a function solely of the meanings of the propositions concerned.
- Valid Argument:
- a deductive argument whose conclusion follows necessarily from its premiss or premisses. (Usually an inference is said to be valid if it is permitted by the laws of some logic.)
- Sound Argument:
- a valid deductive argument which has true premisses. (Obviously, the conclusion is true as well.)
- A deductive argument is valid only if its conclusion follows necessarily from its premisses.
- The fact that a deductive argument is valid does not imply that any of the propositions in the argument are true.
- If the premisses of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must be true.
- In an invalid argument any combination of truth values for the various propositions may occur.
- An argument is sound if and only if it is valid and has true premisses.
The following examples serve to show the possible combinations of truth values in valid categorical syllogisms.
| |
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
| Premisses |
T |
F |
T |
F |
| Conclusion |
T |
F |
logically impossible |
F |
| |
|
|
to be false |
|
Examples:
- Case 1A
| (T) All cattle are mammals. |
| (T) All Angus are cattle. |
| (T) All angus are mammals. |
- Case 2A
| (F) All plants are animals. |
| (F) All deer are plants. |
| (T) All deer are animals. |
- Case 3A
An example is logically impossible to construct. (If a valid argument could have true premisses and a false conclusion, then logic could not be used to extend our knowledge.)
- Case 4A
| (F) No pens are markers. |
| (F) All pencils are pens. |
| (F) No pencils are markers. |
The following examples serve to show the possible combinations of truth values in invalid categorical syllogisms. Note that every combination of truth values is possible in invalid arguments.
| |
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
| premisses |
T |
F |
T |
F |
| conclusion |
T |
T |
F |
F |
Examples:
- Case 1B
| (T) Some states are tyrannies. |
| (T) All dictatorship are tyrannies. |
| (T) Some dictatorships are states. |
- Case 2B
| (F) No sparrows are birds. |
| (F) No flying creatures are birds. |
| (T) Some flying creatures are sparrows. |
- Case 3B
| (T) All acids are chemicals. |
| (T) Some carbon compounds are not acids. |
| (F) Some carbon compounds are not chemicals. |
- Case 4B
| (F) All essays are books. |
| (F) No tomes are books. |
| (F) All tomes are essays. |
All of the following statements are true. Study each carefully. Refer to the cases mentioned in order to see how each statement is true.
- A sound deductive argument is a deductive argument which is valid and whose premiss or premisses are true. (Cf., Case 1A above.)
- It is possible for a deductive argument to be both valid and unsound. (Cf., Cases 2A and 3A above.)
- If a deductive argument is sound, it cannot be invalid. (Cf., Cases 1A and 3A above.)
- If the premisses of a deductive argument are true, then the argument can be valid or invalid. (Cf., Cases 1A, 1B, and 3B above.)
- If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then the premisses can be true or false. (Cf., Cases 1A, 2A, 1B, and 2B above.)
- If a deductive argument is sound, then its conclusion must be true. (Cf., Cases 1A and 3A above.)
- If the premisses of a deductive argument are true, then the conclusion can be true or false. (Cf., Cases 2A, 4A, 2B, and 4B above.)
- If a deductive argument has a false premiss, then the argument must be unsound. (Cf., Cases 2A, 4A, 2B, and 4B above.)
- If a deductive argument is valid, then its conclusion can be true or it can be false. (Cf., Cases 1A, 2A, and 4A above.)
- if every proposition in a deductive arguent is true, then the argument can be either sound or unsound. (Cf., Cases 1A, and 1B above.)
See http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/tvs_quiz.html for more examples of true-false questions on the topic of "Truth, Validity, and Soundness." Also, see http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/tvs.html for lecture notes on this topic.
Next: Summary of Informal Fallacies
Up: COURSE SYLLABUS Philosophy 103:
Previous: Course Requirements
Contents
Index
Lee Archie
2008-08-27