I. With respect to the good, right, happiness, the good is not a
disposition. The good involves a teleological system that involves
actions. |
|
A. Good is that which all things aim. Something is
good if it performs its proper function. E.g., a good coffee
cup or a good red oak. |
|
|
1. A right action is that which is conducive to
the good, and different goods correspond to the differing sciences
and arts. |
|
|
2. "The god" or best good is that which
is desired for its own sake and for the sake which we desire all
other ends or goods. For human beings, eudaemonia is
activity of the soul in accordance with arete (excellence,
virtue, or what it's good for). Eudaemonia is living well and
doing well in the affairs of the world. |
|
B. The good of human beings cannot be answered
with the exactitude of a mathematical problem since mathematics
starts with general principles and argues to conclusions. |
|
|
1. Ethics starts with actual moral judgments before the formulation of general principles. |
|
|
2. Aristotle presupposes natural tendencies in
people. |
|
C. Aristotle distinguishes between happiness (eudaemonia)
and moral virtue: |
|
|
1. Moral virtue is not the end of life for it can
go with inactivity, misery, and unhappiness. |
|
|
2. Happiness, the end of life, that to which all
aims, is activity in accordance with reason (reason is the arete or
peculiar excellence of persons). |
|
|
|
a. Happiness is an activity involving both moral
and intellectual arete. |
|
|
|
b. Some external goods are necessary in order to
exercise that activity. |
II. The Good Character. |
|
A. People have a natural capacity for good
character, and it is developed through practice. The capacity does
not come first--it's developed through practice. |
|
|

|
|
|
1. The sequence of human behavior raises the question
of which is preeminent--acts
or dispositions. Their interaction is broken by Aristotle's distinction between acts
which create good dispositions and acts which flow from the good
disposition once it has been created.
|
|
|
2. Arete is a disposition developed out of
a capacity by the proper exercise of that capacity. |
|
|
3. Habits are developed through acting; a person's
character is the structure of habits and is formed by what we do. |
|
B. Virtue, arete, or excellence is defined
as a mean between two extremes of excess and defect in regard to a
feeling or action as the practically wise person would determine it.
The mean cannot be calculated a priori. |
|
|
1. The mean is relative to the individual and
circumstances. For example, consider the following traits: |
|
|
|
Defect |
Mean |
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cowardliness |
courage |
rashness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
humility |
pride |
vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
frugal |
giving |
liberal |
|
|
|
|
|
2. The level of courage necessary is different for
a philosophy teacher, a commando, and a systems programmer. |
|
|
3. Phronesis or practical wisdom is
the ability to see the right thing to do in the circumstances.
Notice, especially, Aristotle's theory does not imply ethical
relativism because there are appropriate standards. |
|
|
4. In the ontological
dimension, virtue is a mean; in the axiological
dimension, it is an extreme or excellence. Martin Luther King, Jr. relates
his struggle to understand this difference in his "Letter from Birmingham
Jail" when he wrote, "You speak of our activity in Birmingham as
extreme… But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized
as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained
a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for
love… Was not Amos an extremist for justice… Was not Paul an
extremist for the Christian gospel… Perhaps the South, the nation
and the world are in dire need of creative extremists.'' |
|
|
5.Some presumptively virtuous behaviors can be an
extreme as when, for example, the medieval philosopher Peter Abélard explains, No long time
thereafter I was smitten with a grievous illness, brought upon me by
my immoderate zeal for study. (Peter Abélard, Historia Calamitatum
trans. Ralph Adams Cram (St. Paul, MN: Thomas A. Boyd, 1922), 4.) |
|
|
6. In the ontological
dimension, virtue is a mean; in the axiological
dimension, it is an extreme or excellence. E.g., Hartmann's Diagram: |

|
|
|
7. Pleasure and pain are powerful determinants of
our actions. |
III. Pleasure is the natural accompaniment
of unimpeded activity. Pleasure, as such, is neither good nor bad. |
|
A. Even so, pleasure is something positive and its
effect is to perfect the exercise of activity. Everything from
playing chess to making love is improved with skill. |
|
B. Pleasure cannot be directly sought--it is the
side-product of activity. It is only an element of happiness. |
|
C. The good person, the one who has attained eudaemonia,
is the standard as to what is truly pleasant or unpleasant. |
IV. Friendship: a person's relationship to
a friend is the same as the relation to oneself. The friend can be
thought of as a second self. |
|
A. In friendship a person loves himself (egoism)
not as one seeks money for himself, but as he gives his money away
to receive honor. |
|
B. The kinds of friendship: |
|
|
1. Utility |
|
|
2. Pleasure |
|
|
3. The Good--endures as long as both retain their
character. |
V. The Contemplative Faculty--the exercise
of perfect happiness in intellectual or philosophic activity. |
|
A. Reason is the highest faculty of human beings.
We can engage in it longer than other activities. |
|
B. Philosophy is loved as an end-in-itself, and so
eudaemonia implies leisure and self-sufficiency as an
environment for contemplation. |