Next: Example Test and Quiz
 Up: COURSE SYLLABUS Philosophy 102:
 Previous: Course Requirements
     Contents 
     Index 
Subsections
Important Concepts: be able to characterize and give examples.
| philosophy | 
  | 
sophist | 
| ad ignorantiam | 
  | 
philosophic mind | 
| practical mind | 
  | 
metaphysics | 
| epistemology | 
  | 
axiology | 
| aesthetics | 
  | 
ethics | 
| synoptic | 
  | 
not-Self | 
| enlargement of self | 
  | 
``arrest of life" | 
| decoy of life | 
  | 
irrational knowledge | 
| existentialism | 
  | 
undermine | 
| the Absurd | 
  | 
eluding | 
 
Important Essays : be able to explain in depth
- What is the Socratic Paradox and what is paradoxical about it?
 
- What is Socrates' argument that death is a good?  Why doesn't Socrates believe in hell?
 
- According to Russell, what are the main goals of philosophy?
 
- Characterize Tolstoy's use of faith and the characteristics he ascribes to faith.
 
- According to Camus, how can one find the meaning of life?
 
Important Distinctions: Be able to list differences and give examples.
- faith and reason
 
- practical and philosophic mind
 
- science and philosophy
 
- philosophy and religion
 
 
Important Concepts: be able to characterize and give examples.
| a priori | 
  | 
a posteriori | 
| ontological | 
  | 
cosmological | 
| philosophy of religion | 
  | 
natural theology | 
| efficient cause | 
  | 
Occam's Razor | 
| Great Chain of Being | 
  | 
polar concepts | 
| teleology | 
  | 
rational decision theory | 
| prescriptive law | 
  | 
descriptive law | 
| problem of evil | 
  | 
personalists | 
| theodicy | 
  | 
nonmoral evil | 
 
Important Essays: be able to explain in detail and give possible objections.
- Anselm's Ontological Argument
 
- Aquinas' Argument From Motion (Change)
 
- Aquinas' Argument From (Efficient) Cause
 
- Aquinas' Argument From Necessity
 
- Aquinas' Argument From Gradation (Great Chain of Being)
 
- Aquinas' Argument From Governance (Teleological Argument)
 
- Paley's Watch Argument
 
- Pascal's Wager
 
- Hick's Solution to the Problem of Evil
 
Important Distinctions: be able to list differences and give examples.
- a priori and a posteriori statements
 
- material, efficient, formal, and final causes
 
- potentiality and actuality
 
- prescriptive and descriptive law
 
- design and chance
 
- moral evil and nonmoral evil
 
Important Concepts: be able to characterize and give examples.
| determinism (hard) | 
  | 
determinism (soft) | 
| predeterminism | 
  | 
fatalism | 
| predestination | 
  | 
indeterminism | 
| chance | 
  | 
free will | 
| live hypothesis | 
  | 
dead hypothesis | 
| genuine option | 
  | 
ethical relativism | 
| ethical absolutism | 
  | 
psychological relativism | 
| selfishness | 
  | 
self-interest | 
| Ring of Gyges | 
  | 
other-regarding motives | 
| altruism | 
  | 
existence | 
| essence | 
  | 
existentialism | 
| psychological egoism | 
  | 
ethical egoism | 
 
Important Essays: be able to explicate the following questions.
- What is James' genuine option theory?
 
- What is the argument from moral progress (against ethical relativism)?
 
- What is the argument from multiple standards (against ethical relativism)?
 
- What is the linguistic refutation of psychological relativism? How does it refute the Myth of the Ring of Gyges.
 
- Why can't ethical relativism be universalized? 
 
- How are we ``condemned to be free``?
 
Important Distinctions: be able to list differences and give examples.
- selfishness and self-interest
 
- psychological relativism and ethical relativism
 
- essence and existence
 
- anguish, forlornness, and despair
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Next: Example Test and Quiz
 Up: COURSE SYLLABUS Philosophy 102:
 Previous: Course Requirements
     Contents 
     Index 
Lee Archie
2003-08-19