Argument Indicators, Premise and Conclusion, Quiz with Examples
Directions: Assume that each
transitional word or phrase given below appears before a statement
in an argumentative passage.
Would any statement following that word or
phrase most likely be a premise (i.e., a reason), a conclusion,
or a sentence or clause of roughly equal or parallel logical status?
“nevertheless”
The conjunctive adverb “nevertheless” usually connects
clauses of equal status.
Example: “My elder brother has a smile on his face;
nevertheless, in his heart he is very much
distressed.[1]
“inasmuch as”
(also “inasmuchas”)
The conjunction connecting two independent clauses “inasmuch
as” (also written mostly in older texts and legal documents
as “in as much as”) is here a premise indicator, but
the word can also indicate an explanation.
Example: “The complaint is sometimes heard that the
influence of his [Ben Franklin's] style upon our literature has
been detrimental, in as much as it has tended to check the
development of certain of the finer literary
graces.”[2]
“therefore”
The conjunctive adverb “therefore” is a conclusion
indicator in argumentative discourse.
Example: The history of the art of our own country is not
intelligible if one does not know of contemporary movements abroad.
The gaze of the historian therefore must not be fixed upon
one country alone, but must embrace Europe, —indeed, the whole
world.[3]
“since”
The subordinating conjunction “since” is often used to
give a reason for a conclusion.
Example: “Since terracottas are small and easily
transported, the place of discovery is not necessarily the place of
manufacture, and since the moulds are also easily transported,
figures could be made at one place and moulds prepared at
another.”[4]
“because”
The subordinating conjunction “because“ is a premise
indicator in arguments. It can also be used to indicate causal
explanations.
Example: Children under thirteen to fifteen lack, of
course, certain emotions. This lack is practically important
because it limits or changes the form of their appreciation
of certain aspects of
literature.”[5]
“for the reason that”
The phrase “for the reason that ” is a premise
indicator which precedes the premise, whereas the phrase
“for this reason.” given below in question 14,
is a premise indicator which refers back to the previous clause.
Example: “The tone of the violin is not at its best
while in the ‘white” [i.e., lacking subtle tonal
quality], for the reason that the surfaces of the instrument
which strike the air, and in part account for tone, are more or less
spongy.”[6]
“in light of”
The phrase “in light of” can function as a premise
indicator, as in the following passage from a biology textbook.
Example: The immediate assumption, particularly in light
of the fact that the cell is known to be mostly water by mass and
volume, is that the cell is simply a bag of
fluid.[7]
“as a result”
The phrase “as a result” can frequently function
as a conclusion indicator in an argumentative context; otherwise,
the phrase can indicate a causal relation in an explanation.
Example: “[R]esearchers have noticed that teachers,
by virtue of their role in the children's lives, have more
ready entrée to the households that anthropologists
do.… As a result, teachers are more likely to
view the households as repositories of funds of knowledge capable
of providing opportunities for learning than to see them as
hindrances to academic
progress.[8]
“for”
The coordinating conjunction “for” can function as
a reason for a conclusion.
Example: “In a sense, art is a form of propaganda,
for it represents an individual's or group's point of
view, and this view is often presented as truth or
a fact.”[9]
“as indicated by”
The phrase “as indicated by ” is often used as a
premise indicator.
Example: “[A]s indicated by the
narratives that older men related during my field work …,
ancestral ethnic affiliation continues to be maintained even as
the original language is replaced by
Kichwa.”[10]
“although”
The the subordinating conjunction “although”
connects clauses of equal status — the word contrasts
the clauses.
Example: “[T]he client must come to know
the distinction between fear … and anxiety. Although
the inner experiences may seem identical, the objects of fear
and anxiety are different; one existing and the other
imaginary.”[11]
“as shown by”
The phrase “as shown by” indicates a premise
indicator when used in arguments.
Example: These deposits are partly glacial, as
shown by the glacial pebbles contained in
them.[12]
“hence”
The conjunctive adverb “hence” functions as a
conclusion indicator in arguments.
Example: “Ebenezer Howard's (1899) Garden
Cities of Tomorrow formulated town planning … so
that … both city life and ‘nature’ were
incorporated directly into urban design. Hence,
artificial environments could … change the moral character
of inhabitants.”[13]
“for this reason”
The phrase “for this reason” is a premise indicator.
Note that unlike most of the other argument indicators, “for
this reason” indicates the preceding clause is the
premise. So in the example below the reason referenced by the
demonstrative pronoun “this” in the phrase “for this
reason” is the first clause: “Since
every body is infinitely divisible.”
Notice, as well, that first clause also has the indicator “since,”
so, in a sense, we are doubly sure the first clause is a premise.
Example: “Since every body is infinitely divisible,
it does not follow for this reason that the world is composed
of an infinite number of material particles called
atoms.”[14]
“accordingly”
The conjunctive adverb “accordingly” can be one of
the most missed conclusion indicators.
Example: “[T]he flow of thought and life makes it
impossible for two historians to approach the same period and the
same historical material from the same standpoint. Accordingly,
every generation has its own history of the
past.”[15]
2. Edward Jewitt et al., “Franklin's
Literary Deficiencies,” Literary Digest: A Repository
of Contemporaneous Thought 32 no. 4 (January 27, 1906),
118.↩
9. Penelope J.E. Davies, et al.,
Janson's
History of Art 8th ed. (London: Prentice Hall, 2011),
xxiii↩
10. Mary-Elizabeth Reeve, Amazonian Kichwa of the Curaray
River (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2022),
113. doi:
10.2307/j.ctv224tnbf.10↩
11. Fritz Pearls,
“The
Work of the Therapist,” in Gifts from Lake Cowichan
ed. Patricia Baumgardner (Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, 1975),
47.↩
12. L.C. Ward,
“A
Soil Survey of Decatur, Jennings … Counties,” in
The Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Cincinnati Series of
Indiana ed. E.R. Cummings ( Indianapolis, IN: Wm. H Runford, 1908).
209.↩
The GNU
Public License assures users the freedom to
use, copy, redistribute, and make modifications only if
they allow these same terms, with or without changes,
for their copies. Works for sale must link to a free copy.