Return to Philosophy Web Homepage Title: Introduction to Logic

Homepage » Logic » Quizzes » Argument Indicators Premise & Conclusion

“The Scholar” 1869
Drawing Edmond Eugéne Valton
National Gallery of Art
Washington, DC

Argument Indicators, Premise and Conclusion, Quiz with Examples



Directions: Assume that each transitional word or phrase given below appears before a statement in an argumentative passage.

Would any statement following that word or phrase most likely be a premise (i.e., a reason), a conclusion, or a sentence or clause of roughly equal or parallel logical status?




  1. “nevertheless”

    The conjunctive adverb “nevertheless” usually connects clauses of equal status.

    Example: “My elder brother has a smile on his face; nevertheless, in his heart he is very much distressed.[1]
  2. “inasmuch as”
    (also “inasmuchas”)

    The conjunction connecting two independent clauses “inasmuch as” (also written mostly in older texts and legal documents as “in as much as”) is here a premise indicator, but the word can also indicate an explanation.

    Example: “The complaint is sometimes heard that the influence of his [Ben Franklin's] style upon our literature has been detrimental, in as much as it has tended to check the development of certain of the finer literary graces.”[2]
  3. “therefore”

    The conjunctive adverb “therefore” is a conclusion indicator in argumentative discourse.

    Example: The history of the art of our own country is not intelligible if one does not know of contemporary movements abroad. The gaze of the historian therefore must not be fixed upon one country alone, but must embrace Europe, —indeed, the whole world.[3]
  4. “since”

    The subordinating conjunction “since” is often used to give a reason for a conclusion.

    Example: “Since terracottas are small and easily transported, the place of discovery is not necessarily the place of manufacture, and since the moulds are also easily transported, figures could be made at one place and moulds prepared at another.”[4]
  5. “because”

    The subordinating conjunction “because“ is a premise indicator in arguments. It can also be used to indicate causal explanations.

    Example: Children under thirteen to fifteen lack, of course, certain emotions. This lack is practically important because it limits or changes the form of their appreciation of certain aspects of literature.”[5]
  6. “for the reason that”



    The phrase “for the reason that ” is a premise indicator which precedes the premise, whereas the phrase “for this reason.” given below in question 14, is a premise indicator which refers back to the previous clause.

    Example: “The tone of the violin is not at its best while in the ‘white” [i.e., lacking subtle tonal quality], for the reason that the surfaces of the instrument which strike the air, and in part account for tone, are more or less spongy.”[6]
  7. “in light of”



    The phrase “in light of” can function as a premise indicator, as in the following passage from a biology textbook.

    Example: The immediate assumption, particularly in light of the fact that the cell is known to be mostly water by mass and volume, is that the cell is simply a bag of fluid.[7]
  8. “as a result”



    The phrase “as a result” can frequently function as a conclusion indicator in an argumentative context; otherwise, the phrase can indicate a causal relation in an explanation.

    Example: “[R]esearchers have noticed that teachers, by virtue of their role in the children's lives, have more ready entrée to the households that anthropologists do.… As a result, teachers are more likely to view the households as repositories of funds of knowledge capable of providing opportunities for learning than to see them as hindrances to academic progress.[8]
  9. “for”



    The coordinating conjunction “for” can function as a reason for a conclusion.

    Example: “In a sense, art is a form of propaganda, for it represents an individual's or group's point of view, and this view is often presented as truth or a fact.”[9]
  10. “as indicated by”



    The phrase “as indicated by ” is often used as a premise indicator.

    Example: “[A]s indicated by the narratives that older men related during my field work …, ancestral ethnic affiliation continues to be maintained even as the original language is replaced by Kichwa.”[10]
  11. “although”



    The the subordinating conjunction “although” connects clauses of equal status — the word contrasts the clauses.

    Example: “[T]he client must come to know the distinction between fear … and anxiety. Although the inner experiences may seem identical, the objects of fear and anxiety are different; one existing and the other imaginary.”[11]
  12. “as shown by”



    The phrase “as shown by” indicates a premise indicator when used in arguments.

    Example: These deposits are partly glacial, as shown by the glacial pebbles contained in them.[12]
  13. “hence”



    The conjunctive adverb “hence” functions as a conclusion indicator in arguments.

    Example: “Ebenezer Howard's (1899) Garden Cities of Tomorrow formulated town planning … so that … both city life and ‘nature’ were incorporated directly into urban design. Hence, artificial environments could … change the moral character of inhabitants.”[13]
  14. “for this reason”



    The phrase “for this reason” is a premise indicator. Note that unlike most of the other argument indicators, “for this reason” indicates the preceding clause is the premise. So in the example below the reason referenced by the demonstrative pronoun “this” in the phrase “for this reason” is the first clause: “Since every body is infinitely divisible.”

    Notice, as well, that first clause also has the indicator “since,” so, in a sense, we are doubly sure the first clause is a premise.

    Example: “Since every body is infinitely divisible, it does not follow for this reason that the world is composed of an infinite number of material particles called atoms.”[14]
  15. “accordingly”



    The conjunctive adverb “accordingly” can be one of the most missed conclusion indicators.

    Example: “[T]he flow of thought and life makes it impossible for two historians to approach the same period and the same historical material from the same standpoint. Accordingly, every generation has its own history of the past.”[15]

If you have difficulty with this quiz, you might want to review the notes on premise indicators, conclusion indicators, and equal-status indicators.


Notes

1. Calvin Wilson Mateer, A Course in Mandarin Lessons (Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission, 1909), II:257.

2. Edward Jewitt et al., “Franklin's Literary Deficiencies,” Literary Digest: A Repository of Contemporaneous Thought 32 no. 4 (January 27, 1906), 118.

3. Richard Muther, The History of Modern Painting in Three Volumes (London: Henry and Co., 1895), I: 1.

4. H.N. Fowler, et al., A Handbook of Greek Archaeology (New York: American Book Company, 1909), 301.

5. E.L. Thorndike, Notes on Child Study (New York: Macmillan, 1901), 76.

6. Arthur Broadley, “Correspondence: Mr. Arthur Broadley Replies,” The Strad XI no. 126 (October, 1900), 179.

7. Eric Wong, Cells: Molecules and Mechanisms (Louisville, KY: Axolotl Academic, 2009), 175.

8. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. “Funds of Knowledge: Learning from Language Minority Households” in Striving for Excellence: The National Education Goals (U.S. Department of Education: February, 1944), III: 180.

9. Penelope J.E. Davies, et al., Janson's History of Art 8th ed. (London: Prentice Hall, 2011), xxiii

10. Mary-Elizabeth Reeve, Amazonian Kichwa of the Curaray River (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2022), 113. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv224tnbf.10

11. Fritz Pearls, “The Work of the Therapist,” in Gifts from Lake Cowichan ed. Patricia Baumgardner (Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, 1975), 47.

12. L.C. Ward, “A Soil Survey of Decatur, Jennings … Counties,” in The Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Cincinnati Series of Indiana ed. E.R. Cummings ( Indianapolis, IN: Wm. H Runford, 1908). 209.

13. John A. Agnew, et al., The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2015), 454.

14. Roger Bacon, The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon trans. R.B. Burke (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1928), I: 171.

15. A.A. Luce, “Activism and Hegelianism,” in Hermathena 173 (1913), 46.

Quizzes Index  Top of Page  Quiz: Statements and Nonstatements

Send corrections or suggestions to
philhelp[at]philosophy.lander.edu
Read the disclaimer concerning this page.
1997-2024 Licensed under the Copyleft GFDL license.

GNU General Public License

The GNU Public License assures users the freedom to
use, copy, redistribute, and make modifications only if
they allow these same terms, with or without changes,
for their copies. Works for sale must link to a free copy.