Fall 2002 ©2002 OPL
Directions: Given the truth of "All splitscreens are practicums" what can be validly inferred about the truth or falsity of "Some practicums are non-splitscreens"? (Cite the proper logical relation and appropriate truth value for each successive inference. You may abbreviate by using "S" and "P" for "splitscreens" and "practicums.")
Statement or Proposition | Logical Relation | Truth Value |
1. All splitscreens are practicums | given | true |
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2K.1beta (1.48)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html successivef02q.tex -split 0
The translation was initiated by Lee Archie on 2002-11-17