|Reading for Philosophical Inquiry: A Brief Introduction to Philosophical Thinking ver. 0.21; An Open Source Reader|
|Prev||Chapter 11. "An Answer to Anselm" by Gaunilo||Next|
Do you think that Gaunilo would agree the following objection applys to Anselm's Ontological Argument?
Nothing is demonstrable unless the contrary implies a contradiction. Nothing that is distinctly conceivable implies a contradiction. Whatever we can conceive as existent, we can also conceive of as nonexistent. There is no being whose non-existence implies a contradiction. Consequently there is no being whose existence is demonstrable.
Explain the differences between "inconceivable" and "unintelligible."
David Hume. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. 1779.