|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Homepage > Introduction > Frequently Asked Questions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Philosophy
102: WebCT Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry Table of Contents
Open your Internet browser (e.g., Internet Explorer™, Netscape®, or Firefox). and enter the exact address for Lander's Campus Portal: https://mylander.lander.edu/cp/home/displaylogin The MyLander portal uses one User Name/one Password logon for Lander University-related accounts: Bearcat Web, Blackboard (WebCT), and your Lander Webmail. For additional help in logging in to WebCT, see this page which should be updated on a regular basis: Lander University WebCT Log In .
"The first part of your Lander University issued email address is your Blackboard ID. For example, if your Lander student email address is sarah.field@lander.edu , your User Name is sarah.field. Your Password is your Bearcat PIN number. Where do I go to log in? From Lander's homepage, you can click on the Blackboard icon
on the right side of the page. You can also type in the following
address in the address field of your Internet browser to
access Lander's Portal: From Blackboard
at Lander University
Start with the ReadMe1 file on the on the philosopher server here: Homepage for WebCT Online Philosophy Course. Then during the first week do the following one step at a time:
(1) Read the ReadMe1 file.
Log into Bearcat
Web and you can access your email account information under the link
"Personal Information." More information about your account is
given here
and here with the email
policy by the Office of Information Technology Services.
To verify that your email account works, email a test message to yourself from a friend's email account or some other account you have set up from another vendor. Highest rated free email accounts are G-mail, Hotmail, and Yahoo.
Much of the learning from the online course comes through the
discussion with class members. The Philosophy Forum message board is
the online equivalent of class participation in an on-campus course. Just as
an absent student cannot contribute to a class, so likewise a late post on
an old topic cannot shed light on the next week's assignments.
You do not have to use MS Word for this course. In your word processing program, with the document you are working on open, click on "File" and then click on "Save As." Click on the down arrow in the File Type drop-down box and choose "DOC." If "DOC' happens not to be listed, then choose the rich text alternative "RTF." The screenshot below illustrates the process with OpenOffice:
If you click ``Options,'' you can find out how many times you have posted as well as find out about other personal data. To do so, click ``Info'' on the same line as your username on the Profile page. Next, click on the ``Posts'' link for a list of all your messages. For more information read the topic "mwforum Discussion Board" in the WebCT Syllabus.
When you log in to the mwforum Philosophy Message Board for the first time, you must enter personal information on your Profile page. To accomplish this, log in to the mwforum Message Board and click on the "Option" link at the top of the page. When the Profile page loads, you can change your password to a more easily remembered password if you wish to do so. Choose a simple easily remembered password and record the password in your philosophy notebook. Also, on this page, be sure to enter your real name so that your posts can be credited. Unless your real name is recorded here on the Profile Page, credit might not be assigned to your posts since the recording program does not have a name assigned to the post. For more information, read the topic "Profile Page" in the WebCT Syllabus.
You need to state your full name, and you should simplify your password. All other information should be kept blank if you wish it to be confidential. Your full name needs to be on the Profile Page so that your posts and comments can be credited. If you hide your email address, other persons who wish to respond to your post cannot do so directly. (Sometimes someone might want to respond to your posts, but does not want to do so publicly.)
The specific purposes of Introduction to Philosophic Inquiry are: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11. What kinds of things are studied? |
The general purpose of Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry is to introduce some of the main problems of philosophy, including
w Are ethical principles relative?
w Are all persons really at heart egoistic?
w What are the best proofs for Gods existence?
w How can truth be established?
w Are there causal determinants of choice?
w Of what does reality exist?
w Are ethical and artistic judgments subjective?
w Is there a purpose and meaning to life?
In this Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry you will learn how to inquire into complex problems and begin to formulate your own philosophy. You will learn effective methods of inquiry, analysis, and criticism.
| 12. Is Introduction to Philosophy a prerequisite? Does this course fulfill any University requirements? I've been trying to register for this course since my freshmen year. Why don't you offer more sections of Logic? |
Philosophy 102: Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry has no prerequisite. This course complements Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic but you need not have taken that course to do well in the Introduction to Logic course. They are entirely independent courses.
Philosophy 102: Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry meets the Humanities General Elective Requirement for many majors.
| 13. My advisor says this course does not fulfill the logical and analytical General Elective Requirement. Why not? It's a philosophy course? |
Philosophy 102: Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry does not meet the logical
and analytical thought requirement, although it does meet the humanities elective
requirement for many majors.
This logic course is sometimes confused with Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic, which
does meet the logical and analytical thought requirement for many
majors.
| 14. How to I get extra-credit in this course? |
Extra credit as make-up work is not offered in this class for two main reasons. First, extra or ``replacement'' work is less important than the topics chosen and scheduled for this class, and second, extra credit is not an adequate substitute for the learning basic ideas of the course. Additionally, the offering of extra credit often conflicts with the legal and ethical requirements of equal opportunity since all persons have the right to the same class policies.
| 15. What counts as a good essay answer on tests? Could you give some examples? |
In general, answering essay questions on tests should be similar to writing a paper where you reconstruct the philosophies in terms of your own thought and words. Clarify your understanding of the question carefully, as if you were explaining the philosophy slowly and carefully to a younger brother or sister.
If the question asks for your own analysis, then feelings, religious beliefs, and political views should be totally avoided unless you give good logical reasons, verifiable empirical evidence, or insightful examples supporting your views. In general, for an adequate answer to test questions about 400 to 450 words are necessary to cover the scope of the questions asked.
There are two detailed analyses of the grading of example essay questions available for this course:
(1) Essay examples analyzed from the point of view of specific criteria and ranked from exceptionally good to very poor with respect to a question on Paley's Design Argument.
(2) Essay examples ranked according to criteria with respect to a question on James' Significance of Life.
| 16. If I do the objective questions on tests by myself, how could you possibly tell if other students are academically dishonest and work together? |
Whether or not students work together on objective questions can be often known conclusively through statistical tests, if the questions are well-designed.
Consider this brief oversimplification by way of explanation. Assuming that the test questions asked are above average difficulty and the probability of answering each question correctly is 50%, then if there were only ten questions, the probability of two students having the same answers would be about one chance in 1,024.
So you can see how the chances of two or more persons having the same 30 to 50 answers in sequence at this level of difficulty would actually be as reliable as DNA evidence presented in a court of law. (Obviously, this would not be the case if the questions were relatively easy to answer.) Some of the statistical tests I've used in the past few semesters are described here: Integrity Castle Rock Research. Recently over ten students either not passed the course or had their grades significantly reduced because they assumed there "would be no way to know" if they collaborated on objective questions.
Even so, I still use objective questions because they help obtain a fair assessment of student work. And I think philosophy courses are not best assessed by timed, online tests. My reasoning is as follows.. I think objective questions are an important part of assessment, because they can be used to hone in on knowledge of specific concepts.
If academic honesty could not be checked, I would not use this method of testing for an open-book test. (Even so, since so many students have not passed the course recently, I strongly recommend that if you are a student who doubts the efficacy of the software that you do your own research on the question or calculate the probabilities for yourself.)
|
Send corrections or suggestions to webmaster@philosophy.lander.edu Read the disclaimer concerning this page. 12.16.09 © 2001-6 GFDL |
![]()
![]()