September 15 2019 02:02 EDT

Gallery of the Rotunda, Library of Congress, LC-D4-13499

Gallery of the Rotunda, Library of Congress


since 01.01.06

Citation Information for “David Hume, ‘Design Argument: Critique’”

This page is not intended to be original or authoritative. The page is a summary of some main points and associated notes on the topic. Undoubtedly, there are scholarly and authoritative sources, both primary and secondary which ought be cited rather than these notes.

However if you find the page of use, your citation should meet the style requirements of the publication for which you are submitting your paper. In general, the current page may be cited in this manner:

Archie, Lee C, "AUTHOR, ‘Design Argument: Critique,’" Philosophy of Religion (June 26, 2006) URL=<>.

Users might find the following references to formats for bibliographic citation helpful:

Top of Page

“The Design Argument is not dead, because the state of opinion in the biological field is not unfavorable to the conclusion that intelligent Purpose is at the heart of the universe; because the study of chemistry and physics leads to a biocentric, and the study of ethics and æsthetics leads to an anthropocentric view of the world; and because no halfway house has as yet been found between the ultimate theories of chance and purpose. It is not likely to die because, in the words of Kant, ‘it gives life to the study of nature, deriving its own existence from it, and thus constantly acquiring new vigor.’” William Hallock Johnson, &rlquo;Is the Design Argument Dead?” Harvard Theological Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919), Vol. XII, No. 1, 328.

Relay corrections, suggestions or questions to
larchie at
Please see the disclaimer concerning this page.
This page last updated 08/29/12
© 2006 Licensed under the GFDL

Valid XHTML 1.1!    Valid CSS!